Everyone Preaches Retention. The Budget Says Otherwise.
Loyalty and retention spend is down 29 percent while budgets chase whatever the machines can tune. Then Wednesday's inflation print landed, and the timing got interesting.
Sit through enough marketing conferences and someone will eventually tell you that retention is the smartest money in the building. Heads nod. Slides advance. Everyone flies home and spends like acquisition is the only game in town.
Gartner just published the receipts.
The 2026 CMO Spend Survey, presented Monday at Gartner's Marketing Symposium in Denver, says awareness and conversion now take 62.6 percent of total media spend, up more than 10 percent since 2024. Loyalty and retention took the other side of that trade: down 29 percent over the same two years, to less than 15 percent of media budgets. And I find this absolutely astonishing.
Digital now claims more than two-thirds of media investment, up 18 percent since 2024. This was 401 CMOs and marketing leaders across North America, the UK, and Europe, most of them at companies north of a billion in revenue. So this isn't a niche mood. It's the herd, moving together.
The streetlight is winning
Why is the money moving? The survey answers in plain language: CMOs are prioritizing channels that can be, in Gartner's phrasing, effectively AI-optimized. For my fellow CRM/Lifecycle/CX folks, I too am perplexed.
Remember the old joke about the man searching for his keys under the streetlight instead of where he dropped them, because the light is better there?
AI just made the light over awareness and conversion blindingly bright. Impressions, clicks, and conversions are exactly the things machines tune well, because the feedback is fast and the math is clean. Retention's feedback loop is slow, entangled with "complexity", and full of humans behaving like humans. So, the dashboards fill up with what's easy to measure, and the budget follows the dashboards. Students of history and epistemology will recognize this as the McNamara fallacy.
Ewan McIntyre, Gartner's Marketing Practice Chief of Research, said it best:
"As AI reshapes the marketing mix, many CMOs are channeling more investment into digital channels and customer acquisition in pursuit of growth. However, AI is not a shortcut around marketing capability. The organizations that will pull ahead are those that pair AI investment with the people, processes and discipline required to turn it into business results." Disclosure: the editorialized bolding, underlining, and italicizing are my own to emphasize the point.
AI can help marketers optimize faster, but optimization is not the same as strategy. My only meager contribution being that a faster optimizer pointed at the wrong objective just gets you to the wrong place sooner. And there is such a thing as being too quick, see World Rally Championship stages. Sometimes, getting there within an average time (also known as "consistency") is the way to win.
Just one more thing
Switching literary devices, humor me as I invoke Peter Falk's Columbo.
Buried within the same release is the most critical detail that our proverbial suspect is likely to overlook. I'll let you guess what random items I have in my rumpled overcoat as I head for the door.
Just one more thing, reader.
The most AI-mature marketing organizations allocate a larger share of budget to loyalty and retention, and a smaller share to digital, than everyone else.
I'm going to re-print that again below with some extra font spice thrown on top.
The most AI-mature marketing organizations allocate a larger share of budget to loyalty and retention, and a smaller share to digital, than everyone else.
The herd's stated reason for abandoning retention is AI, and the organizations that understand AI best are running the opposite direction. Posturing is a much easier route to take on the road to thought and market leadership.
The crowd is buying the tooling to look like the leaders. The leaders already learned the tooling is most valuable where the relationship already exists: richer data, real consent, feedback you can actually act on. The people with the most light are spending it looking where the keys actually are.
Stage Direction: Lt. Anthony Columbo turns from the door back to the suspect
Do you see that, reader? Do you know what that is? That is the mark of a consistent strategy in play, no different from the last twenty years of AI/ML deployment in mature organizations that, up until a few years ago, was only the talk of Nerdtown, population: me.
Wednesday's Child
Gartner fielded that survey between January and March. This morning, Wednesday June 10th, 2026, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that consumer prices rose 0.5 percent in May and 4.2 percent over the trailing year, the first annual reading above 4 percent since April 2023, three years ago.
Which means those budgets, the ones retreating from retention, were set for a world that no longer exists. A reminder to all that retention is cheaper than acquisition and we're seeing the signs that purchasing power is declining. Keeping your own customers and their velocity of spend is going to be challenging enough, let alone acquiring new ones, which runs five to 25 times more expensive, depending on which study you believe.
I can hear the rebuttal forming already: core inflation came in at 2.9 percent, the jump was mostly energy, settle down. Fair, and worth taking seriously.
But here's the thing.
Energy rose 3.9 percent in a single month, it's up 23.5 percent on the year, and it drove over 60 percent of May's increase.
That makes the problem worse, not better. America's superhero coalmine canary and bellwether duo, fuel and grocery prices, hit the hardest on consumer perception and on their wallets. No whammies, no whammies...ooof, double whammy.
Gas is the most visible price in American life. It's posted in foot-tall numbers on every corner, twice a week, whether you're shopping or not. Groceries slice through like a thousand cuts, compounding the pain and perception of declining purchasing power.
Customers don't experience a weighted basket, pun intended. They experience the sign. Felt affordability is what moves switching and substitute-seeking behavior, and the feeling just got measurably worse.
Chicken Little and the Boy Who Cried History
Yes, one month is a stress signal, not a regime change. But the makings of a trend are forming and very few macro signs show that trend being in favor of the average consumer.
For companies, that means that the marketer who was able to make the case to keep funding retention will lose very little and likely gain far more than they would have funding acquisition as a one to one tradeoff.
The marketer who cut retention 29 percent is now finding themselves in a precarious creek sans an oar, at the exact, dire moment their customer file turns flight-risky. Inflation is when loyalty gets audited. Most programs are about to find out what was actually in the account.
I've run the retention side of an enterprise CRM program for a luxury automotive brand, and affordability pressure shows up there early and in public. When monthly payments crept toward four figures, the save was never a coupon. What saved the relationship was noticing, in the data, who was about to leave before they acted like it. Service visits stretching out. Mileage falling. The quiet stuff. None of that is visible from an awareness dashboard, and no acquisition dollar buys it back after they're gone.
The honest counterargument
Maybe the herd is right. There's a respectable case that downturns are when acquisition gets cheap, because competitors retreat and attention goes on sale, and whoever keeps spending buys share at a discount. Some businesses, the high-churn and the growth-stage, really should lean toward acquisition no matter the weather. Additionally, and this is no small "additionally", the systems and data that make up retention, loyalty, lifecycle, CRM (choose your favorite) are rarely easy to transform at all, let alone rapidly.
Both things can be true, and neither explains the actual trade on the table: funding the acquisition push by cutting loyalty spend 29 percent at the moment customers are most price-sensitive. If attention is going on sale, fine, buy some. But you don't sell your 20" premium chrome wheels to pay for the gas. You need both to go anywhere. Editor's note: don't "what about" me with buying smaller wheels, let me have this analogy.
And there's a subtler tell inside the survey's own logic. The stated driver isn't a conviction about cheap share. It's that the top and bottom of the funnel are easier for AI to tune: awareness gets to skip that pesky attribution problem entirely, conversion takes credit for everything it touches, and the messy middle is for the lifecycle marketers to tap dance around.
That's not a strategy choosing a moment. That's a tool choosing a strategy. Bad. No. Do not pass Go. Do not collect two hundred dollars, which means a lot less now than it did when this reference was fresh.
Paying Off the Parable: Reactivity Is the Foil of Success
So, here's where I land. Don't swing the whole budget back; overcorrection is just the herd in a different direction. Instead, put one question to every media line item: does this dollar build the asset, or rent the attention? The asset is the customer base, the resolved identities, the consent you've earned, the lifecycle triggers that notice trouble early. That part compounds, it's cheap relative to the media line, and it's precisely what the AI-mature are quietly funding while everyone else chases the bright light.
Trimming the budget here is a lot like withdrawing from your retirement account early, the compounding negative outweighs any positive even though you don't see it immediately. Standing at the pulpit and proclaiming the virtue of retention is often fair-weather. But as of today, push has come to shove and I'm willing to bet that the disciples of loyalty that didn't forsake the budget are the ones that will have the last word.
Anthony
← More writing · If this was useful, or wrong in an interesting way, tell me: hireme@crmjedi.com.
Get the next one by email
New essays on customer data, measurement, and what actually ships. No spam, no cadence theater.